Do institutional investors have to choose between divestment and engagement?
Staff | June 11, 2020 For institutional investors, the debate still rages over whether to divest from a company they find to have problematic practices where environmental, social and governance issues are concerned or to remain invested and engage with the company to try to push it in the desired direction. A new paper by smart beta platform provider Scientific Beta is suggesting there’s evidence that both strategies actually achieve the sought-after effect and can go hand in hand, rather than investors being required to choose just one option. There are several ways that divestment and engagement can mingle to strengthen the clout of an investor, the paper found. Collaborative engagement campaigns, where both current and potential shareholders come together to push a message to a company, demonstrate that an investor doesn’t need to be invested to express its views in a powerful and relevant way. As well, shareholders of a company have to maintain the possibility of divestment in order for their engagement to carry its full potential weight. Read: Head to head: Is carbon divestment becoming obligatory for pension plans? “A shareholder who engages with a company without signalling a willingness to draw a red line — by exit in case engagement fails — will enter the negotiation...