Under DOL Rule’s Shadow, Fiduciary Fight Rages On
The court’s decision “is instrumentally useful for advocates of stronger fiduciary protections in investment advice to make that case,” Tierney said. Indeed, Ron Rhoades, associate professor of finance at Western Kentucky University and director of its personal financial planning program, said in a recent email that Reg BI “does not impose a fiduciary duty of loyalty” but “a new ‘best interest’ obligation that is still in the process of being defined and applied.” With a new DOL fiduciary rule on the horizon, he said, “the fiduciary battlegrounds will continue to be active spheres where pro-fiduciary advocates will be pitted against firms whose economic models are threatened by the fiduciary standard.” Fiduciary Battleground The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision “adds additional traction to the ongoing movement in the marketplace, aided by fiduciary advocates and federal and state securities regulators, to move toward a bona fide fiduciary standard,“ according to Rhoades. The most important aspect of the Massachusetts decision, according to Rhoades, “is that states are not preempted from adopting fiduciary standard by federal securities laws,“ nor by the SEC’s adoption of Reg BI. While the Massachusetts decision “is not binding upon other state courts, nor on the federal courts, its precedent may well give...