International Comparison Shows a Big Flaw in Social Security: Cato Scholar
What You Need to Know A new analysis by the Cato Institute’s Romina Boccia points out some stark differences between the retirement safety nets in the U.S. and the U.K. Most striking, wealthy people in the U.S. get far more back from Social Security than their European peers. A reduction in benefits for higher earners, while painful, is one of few viable solutions, Boccia argues. The shaky financial position of the U.S. Social Security system is a major problem facing the federal government and workers who expect to rely on the program to avoid poverty in retirement, but near-universal agreement about the importance of Social Security doesn’t mean finding a solution is an easy matter. As Romina Boccia, director of budget and entitlement policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, wrote in a recent analysis posted to her Debt Dispatch blog, U.S. legislators’ procrastination has allowed the Social Security system to run into the red with a $120 billion annual cash-flow deficit and a $23 trillion long-term unfunded obligation. Simply put, tough actions are going to be needed in the years ahead to “stop the bleeding,” Boccia warns, and she makes the case that raising taxes on workers isn’t the best approach...