What You Need to Know The advisor alleges that company policies degraded his ability to serve clients. One provision bars him from contacting past, present and potential clients for two years post-employment. Felix Kwan also alleges that the firm breached his employment agreement. A recently resigned Edelman Financial Engines advisor has filed suit against the firm and related entities, challenging the non-solicitation provisions in his employee contract as unenforceable. The lawsuit, filed earlier in August in California Superior Court for Contra Costa County, also touches on shifts in custodial arrangements following Charles Schwab’s TD Ameritrade acquisition. Felix Kwan started working at Edelman as an associate director, financial planning, in April 2012, and entered into an employment agreement with a non-solicitation provision, according to the complaint, which seeks a jury trial. Barred from Soliciting Clients The provision, among other points, purportedly prohibits Kwan from initiating contact with past, current or potential clients to induce them to leave the firm for two years following the end of his employment, and from accepting business from clients during that period, the suit says. The employment contract’s non-solicitation provision is not enforceable under California laws banning non-compete and non-solicitation provisions, Kwan asserts. “It is well...