The DOL Retirement Security Rule Promotes a Narrow Worldview
What You Need to Know Robert Merton said retirement security is a function of income, not assets. In the new Retirement Security Rule, the Labor Department avoids mentioning retirement income. The author believes the wording reflects how department officials think. When the Labor Department wrote the document it used to describe its new Retirement Security Rule, department officials embraced the worldview of registered securities sales representatives and other investment advisors. Not the worldview of insurance agents, and certainly not the worldview of retirement income distribution planners. Investment advisors, insurance agents and income planners differ markedly in terms of perspectives, philosophies, product preferences, licensure, methodologies and priorities. In many ways, their worldviews are as incompatible as freshwater fish and saltwater fish. Nothing in the new DOL rule will support financial professional diversity in any meaningful sense. What’s Missing The DOL analysis of the new rule is 153,943 words long. That’s equal to the total word count of two average novels. But something important is missing: Not once in this mighty text do DOL officials use the two-word term “retirement income,” outside of references to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, one direct quote from a Labor Department advisory opinion, and references...