![](\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/app\/uploads\/2022\/10\/france-brazil-plane-crash-wreckage-AP-580x387.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/app\/uploads\/2022\/10\/france-brazil-plane-crash-wreckage-AP-scaled.jpg\")
<\/div>\nA French appeals court will begin a new trial on Monday of Air France and Airbus, 16 years after a jetliner plunged into the Atlantic killing all 228 people on board.<\/p>\n
A lower French court cleared both companies of corporate manslaughter<\/a> in 2023, following a historic public trial over the disappearance of flight AF447 while en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris on June 1, 2009.<\/p>\n After a two-year search for the A330\u2019s black boxes, French investigators found pilots had mishandled the temporary loss of data from iced-up speed sensors and pushed the jet into an aerodynamic stall, or free fall, without responding to alerts.<\/p>\n Read more: French Court Clears Air France, Airbus Over Rio-Paris Plane Crash<\/a><\/p>\n But the trial more than a decade later also shed light on discussions between Air France and Airbus about growing problems with the sensors, or \u201cpitot probes\u201d, that generate speed readings.<\/p>\n Following nine weeks of evidence, a Paris judge listed four acts of negligence by Airbus and one by Air France, but found these were not enough under French criminal law to establish a definitive link to the loss of the jet during a midnight storm.<\/p>\n The new trial is expected to stretch over two months of hearings, during which lawyers for victims\u2019 families will try to persuade appeal judges that there was a direct link between the previously identified negligence and the crash.<\/p>\n \u201cIt is painful for the families to reopen everything 16 years later, but it is essential to keep going and demonstrate that there was criminal culpability,\u201d said Sebastien Busy, a lawyer for one of the main associations of victims\u2019 relatives.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you take one of those acts of negligence away, then the accident would never have happened,\u201d he told Reuters.<\/p>\n Both companies have consistently denied any criminal wrongdoing.<\/p>\n The maximum fine for corporate manslaughter is just 225,000 euros, but prosecutors believe a new trial will help to provide a cathartic effect for families, who protested against the earlier verdict.<\/p>\n The AF447 disaster has been among the most widely debated in aviation and led to a number of technical and training changes.<\/p>\n Prosecutors have argued that Airbus reacted too slowly to the rising number of speed incidents and that the airline failed to do enough to ensure pilots were adequately trained.<\/p>\n The earlier trial exposed bitter divisions between two of France\u2019s flagship companies over the relative roles of pilot and sensor in the country\u2019s worst air disaster.<\/p>\n The chief executives of Airbus and Air France, part of Franco-Dutch Air France-KLM, are expected to make statements during the opening hearing, which starts at 1:30 p.m. (1130 GMT) on Monday.<\/p>\n (Reporting by Tim Hepher; editing by Alistair Bell and Alex Richardson)<\/p>\n Photograph: Workers unload debris, belonging to the crashed Air France flight AF447, from the Brazilian Navy\u2019s Constitution Frigate in the port of Recife, northeast of Brazil, June 14, 2009. It was the worst plane crash in Air France history, killing people of 33 nationalities and having lasting impact. It led to changes in air safety regulations, how pilots are trained and the use of airspeed sensors. (AP Photo\/Eraldo Peres, File)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Topics<\/span> France<\/a> <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n Was this article valuable?<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n