{"id":23156,"date":"2025-02-14T23:19:49","date_gmt":"2025-02-14T23:19:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/?p=812157"},"modified":"2025-02-14T23:19:49","modified_gmt":"2025-02-14T23:19:49","slug":"california-insurance-commissioner-rejects-state-farms-22-rate-request","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/2025\/02\/14\/california-insurance-commissioner-rejects-state-farms-22-rate-request\/","title":{"rendered":"California Insurance Commissioner Rejects State Farm\u2019s 22% Rate Request"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/img\/social\/opengraph\/ij-social-default-1200x630.png\" class=\"ff-og-image-inserted\"><\/div>\n<ul class=\"nav nav-tabs tabs tabs-entry\">\n<li class=\"active\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/news\/west\/2025\/02\/14\/812157.htm\">Article<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/news\/west\/2025\/02\/14\/812157.htm?comments\" rel=\"nofollow\">0 Comments<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"article-content clearfix\">\n<p>California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara did not approve an emergency, interim 22% rate request from State Farm, instead calling a meeting with the carrier to get some answers about the carrier\u2019s financial situation and more.<\/p>\n<p>State Farm General earlier this month <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/news\/west\/2025\/02\/03\/810534.htm\">asked the California Department of Insurance to immediately approve interim rate increases<\/a>, including 22% average for homeowners.<\/p>\n<div class=\"bzn bzn-sized bzn-intext\">\n<ins data-revive-zoneid=\"79\" data-revive-block=\"1\" data-revive-id=\"36eb7c2bd3daa932a43cc2a8ffbed3a9\"><\/ins> <\/div>\n<p>The carrier, the state\u2019s top homeowners insurer, is partly blaming the devastating Los Angeles wildfires for the request. As of February 14, the carrier reported roughly 11,400 total home and auto claims, paying out more than $1.35 billion.<\/p>\n<p>In a <a href=\"https:\/\/ooagbytab.cc.rs6.net\/tn.jsp?f=001ZM3ksLTZqSbv5h79OksbQi4aaNsFTW-JjXvmYs6_NHSdOyECB5Ydd5YOCoA3ebem-aizGOgF-ZE9cUUK0VlPoil2YLkNIxX5rsJ5tWMFTl6NjqRbMgSolU1q1QRNITWvr8Hd1DLTbcRg7d75aDJBdXwFvCsaa8PX8QdXMevA1cgYPbvOILwyYWeAqzvs9QFqfDm_nAsZr7FNHjCZ3qRsgyiEZj2FXd4gUB3wJpFqw_UqrhdpTT4yDgOqz2ayx3ZUzhodRXoreQTAfnA2tJFwpIh0FHG56GrDadJNsjt_I7E=&amp;c=60Em-Cyf-1XSFe9QQ6_Opqm0TMi9b6ZL_-dV-ypsHYAeaBHmITZUKQ==&amp;ch=AFLDEPCeUi-qMmHDmpx9SUr2wtSB6WH7F04yaurGIgxeNLLl7ix6LA==\">letter<\/a> Lara issued on Friday, he wrote: \u201cUnder the strict review laid out by Proposition 103, the burden is on State Farm to show why this is needed now. State Farm has not met its burden.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>State Farm responded to a request for comment with a statement:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are very disappointed the Commissioner ignored his department\u2019s recommendation to take the critical and necessary step to approve State Farm General\u2019s request for interim rate increases associated with our June 2024 filings.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>According to the statement, by not approving the request it \u201csends a strong message to State Farm General about the support it will receive to collect sufficient premiums in the future\u201d and that the carrier has \u201cgone to great lengths to clearly answer the questions outlined by the Commissioner.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile we\u2019re positioned to handle all of the claims associated with the most recent wildfires, State Farm General must seriously consider its options within the California insurance market going forward,\u201d the statement reads.<\/p>\n<div class=\"bzn bzn-sized bzn-intext-2\">\n<ins data-revive-zoneid=\"162\" data-revive-block=\"1\" data-revive-id=\"36eb7c2bd3daa932a43cc2a8ffbed3a9\"><\/ins> <\/div>\n<p>Up until recently, Lara had been accommodating to insurers, pushing through reforms indented to reverse course from a broad pullback by the state\u2019s top writers over increasing wildfire risks and burdensome regulations.<\/p>\n<p>Lara scheduled an in-person meeting on Feb. 26, inviting State Farm to address questions surrounding issues including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>State Farm\u2019s financial stability<\/li>\n<li>Justification for the emergency rate increase<\/li>\n<li>Consumer impact<\/li>\n<li>Transparency in decision-making<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>State Farm\u2019s emergency rate increases would have been effective May 1, and includes 22% for homeowners, 15% for renters, 15% for condominium and 38% for rental dwelling. Despite multiple approved rate changes, State Farm stopped writing new policies in California and non-renewed thousands of existing policies.<\/p>\n<p>State Farm said at the time of its request that the increase is needed to align cost and risk and enable State Farm to rebuild capital. Over the last nine years, the lack of alignment has meant that for every $1 collected in premium, the carrier has spent $1.26, resulting in more $5 billion in cumulative underwriting losses, according to State Farm<\/p>\n<p>In May 2023, State Farm stopped writing any new policies in California. Several other large carriers made similar moves around that time.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cState Farm General still insures high concentrations of risk in California that could generate financial losses multiple times larger than the company\u2019s surplus,\u201d according to statement from the carrier issued following the request. \u201cA smaller capital base will further constrain State Farm General\u2019s ability to provide coverage. Reinsurance will assist us in paying what we owe to customers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Beside citing regulatory burdens in California, carriers pulling back from writing in the state have cited the increasing risk of wildfires. CalFire data show that seven of the state\u2019s 10 most destructive wildfires have occurred in the last 10 years.<\/p>\n<p>Insured losses from the Palisades and Eaton fires are likely to rise. At this point losses look to be heading toward early estimates from modelers of up to $40 billion.<\/p>\n<p>Insurance companies <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/news\/west\/2025\/02\/13\/812009.htm\">have so far paid out more than $6.9 billion for losses<\/a> from the biggest two of the Los Angeles-area wildfires that swept through the region and destroyed tens of thousands of homes last month.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s according to the California Department of Insurance, which on Feb. 13 released the latest data on claims paid for the fires. The figures were updated from data out on Jan. 30, which showed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/news\/national\/2025\/01\/30\/810252.htm\">$4.2 billion in claims paid<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Data from insurers released by the CDI show 33,717 claims have been filed for home, business, living expenses and other disaster-related expenses. The data show 5,597 auto insurance claims have been filed for $73 million.<\/p>\n<p class=\"tagtag\"> <span class=\"tagtag\">Topics<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/location\/california\/\" class=\"btn btn-sm btn-primary tagtag\">California<\/a> <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-poll\" data-post=\"812157\">\n<div class=\"article-poll-vote\">\n<p>Was this article valuable?<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-poll-feedback voted-no\">\n<form class=\"feedback-form\">\n<p>Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.<\/p>\n<p> <textarea placeholder=\"Enter your feedback...\"><\/textarea> <button type=\"submit\" class=\"submit\" disabled>Submit<\/button> <button class=\"cancel\">No Thanks<\/button> <\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-poll-feedback voted-yes\">\n<form class=\"feedback-form\">\n<p>Thank you! <span class=\"percent\"><\/span>% of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.<\/p>\n<p> <textarea placeholder=\"Enter your feedback...\"><\/textarea> <button type=\"submit\" class=\"submit\" disabled>Submit<\/button> <button class=\"cancel\">No Thanks<\/button> <\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-poll-more-articles\">\n<p class=\"thank-you-text\">Here are more articles you may enjoy.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"subscribe-banner subscribe-banner-in-content-2\">\n<div class=\"content\">\n<h4>The most important insurance news,in your inbox every business day.<\/h4>\n<p>Get the insurance industry&#8217;s trusted newsletter<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Article 0 Comments California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara did not approve an emergency, interim 22% rate request from State Farm, instead calling a meeting with the carrier to get some answers about the carrier\u2019s&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23157,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[993,1292,156,1,9],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/california-insurance-commissioner-rejects-state-farms-22-rate-request.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23156"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23156\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23157"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}