![](\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/app\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Meta-HQ-Bloomberg-580x386.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/app\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Meta-HQ-Bloomberg-scaled.jpg\")
<\/div>\nMeta Platforms Inc. rebuffed the Federal Trade Commission\u2019s plans to modify a 2020 privacy settlement with the company, arguing that such a move would need approval from a federal court.<\/p>\n
A Meta lawyer told the FTC\u2019s five commissioners at a hearing Tuesday that the consumer protection agency doesn\u2019t have authority to modify the agreement without the company\u2019s consent.<\/p>\n
In previous cases, modifications to settlements were \u201cmore technical corrections,\u201d Meta lawyer James Rouhandeh said. But as far as large-scale changes, \u201cthe commission doesn\u2019t have that authority to do that on its own.\u201d<\/p>\n
The commission last year alleged Meta violated terms of the 2020 settlement and sought to open a new proceeding to also ban Meta\u2019s use of facial recognition tools and monetizing children\u2019s data. Meta has been under a privacy consent decree with the FTC since 2012<\/a>, but agreed to pay $5 billion and operate under stiffer privacy requirements under the 2020<\/a> accord with the agency.<\/p>\n The agency didn\u2019t say when it might issue a decision. With the election of Donald Trump as the next US president, his administration could drop the effort to modify Meta\u2019s settlement once it gains a Republican majority at the FTC next year.<\/p>\n The company has filed several legal challenges to the proceeding, both in federal court and before the FTC. Tuesday\u2019s hearing before the FTC\u2019s commissioners involved whether the agency has the authority to modify its orders.<\/p>\n Commissioner Andrew Ferguson, one of the agency\u2019s two Republicans who could become chair in the next administration, raised several questions about why the agency opened an internal proceeding to modify the order terms rather than seeking to hold Meta in contempt in federal court.<\/p>\n \u201cIt seems foreign to me to say when someone violates the order, rewrite the order,\u201d Ferguson said, noting that the way the proceeding was structured could lead to a company being \u201con the hook forever.\u201d<\/p>\n Reenah Kim, a lawyer for the FTC, argued that Congress gave the agency the ability to modify orders in limited circumstances and it has used that power sparingly.<\/p>\n Photo: Photographer: David Paul Morris\/Bloomberg<\/em><\/p>\n Was this article valuable?<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n