{"id":17621,"date":"2019-11-22T09:00:23","date_gmt":"2019-11-22T14:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.benefitscanada.com\/news\/editorial-will-canadians-ever-really-retire-138820"},"modified":"2019-11-22T09:00:23","modified_gmt":"2019-11-22T14:00:23","slug":"editorial-will-canadians-ever-really-retire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/2019\/11\/22\/editorial-will-canadians-ever-really-retire\/","title":{"rendered":"Editorial: Will Canadians ever really retire?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"alignleft clearfix\">\n<div class=\"wp-caption feature-image alignleft\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"316\" height=\"190\" src=\"https:\/\/www.benefitscanada.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/0718-JP.jpg\" class=\"attachment-feature size-feature wp-post-image\" alt title=\"Editorial: Will Canadians ever really retire?\"> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"byline\"><span>Jennifer Paterson<\/span>&nbsp;|&nbsp;November 22, 2019<\/p>\n<p>I think it\u2019s fair to say that retirement security is top of mind for the majority of Canadians. And politicians are listening: it was constructive to see all the major parties coming up with measures to deal with the issue during the most recent election campaign.<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benefitscanada.com\/news\/editorial-federal-election-promises-must-focus-on-canadas-evolving-workforce-137120\">my last editorial<\/a>, I summarized the various election platforms and pressed the point that Canada\u2019s workforces, and workplaces, are evolving. Federal and provincial governments must come to terms with this reality, and with how demographics and longevity are affecting when, and how, Canadians are retiring, alongside changes to employment standards and laws.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Read:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.benefitscanada.com\/news\/editorial-federal-election-promises-must-focus-on-canadas-evolving-workforce-137120\">Editorial: Federal election promises must focus on Canada\u2019s evolving workforce<\/a>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benefitscanada.com\/news\/canadas-retirement-system-ranked-9th-in-the-world-137697\">annual comparison of 37 global retirement systems<\/a>, Mercer recently ranked Canada in ninth place, one spot better than last year. But Mercer also noted certain common challenges facing all pension systems, whether in the Netherlands, which was top in this year\u2019s ranking, or in Thailand, which ranked the lowest. As life expectancy improves \u2014 positive news, to be sure \u2014 so do the pressures on our public resources to support the health of older citizens. Throw in Canada\u2019s declining access to workplace pension plans and turbulent conditions for long-term investing \u2014 and the future isn\u2019t looking great.<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benefitscanada.com\/?p=138994&amp;preview=true\">this month\u2019s Our Take<\/a>, the authors of two discussion papers from the Ottawa Council on Aging\u2019s expert panel on income security, question Canada\u2019s current age of eligibility. According to Statistics Canada, some 36.3 per cent of people aged 65 to 69 will still be in the workforce in 2024. If Canada continues to pay pension benefits at age 65, the authors note, many seniors will be working full time and earning at lifetime highs, while also receiving a pension.<\/p>\n<p>Will our new government consider a system that aligns the age at which pensions begin to be paid with the actual age at which people leave the workforce? Could savings from old-age security benefits and the guaranteed income supplement be allocated to raise the minimum income guarantee for the elderly? For the Canada Pension Plan and workplace pensions, could savings be translated into lower pre-retirement contributions or higher benefits starting at a later age?<\/p>\n<p>In the context of the trend towards delayed retirement, these are important questions. And these papers attempt to answer them, while also suggesting that a comprehensive review and consultation of the whole retirement system is in order.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Read:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.benefitscanada.com\/?p=138994&amp;preview=true\">What\u2019s next for Canada\u2019s retirement income system?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I have no doubt Justin Trudeau\u2019s Liberals will continue to focus on enhancing the CPP and Canadians\u2019 retirement security, but the cyclical nature of any election system means that moving backwards instead of forwards on these issues is still a real possibility.<\/p>\n<p>In one of the discussion papers mentioned earlier, pension consultant Bob Baldwin argues for the review of Canada\u2019s regulatory regime and tax rules to facilitate innovative pension plan designs. We\u2019re seeing movement there, for sure, but with the component parts of our retirement income system constantly changing, he suggests the system is viewed as a policy file that\u2019s always open.<\/p>\n<p>Governments come and go. That\u2019s how democracy works. But certain issues are universal. Whether they voted for the Liberals, the Conservatives, the New Democrats or the Green Party, every Canadian has the right to retire with confidence, when they\u2019re ready. But until we take a hard, sustainable look at improving our retirement income system \u2014 including a better alignment of private pension plans and the public program \u2014 that reality is just slipping farther and farther away.<\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"mailto:jennifer.paterson@tc.tc\">Jennifer Paterson<\/a> is editor of<\/em> Benefits Canada<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Editor\u2019s note: The graph on page 33 of the October issue reversed the labels of the HOOPP\u2019s liability hedge and return seeking portfolios<\/em><\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.benefitscanada.com\/news\/editorial-will-canadians-ever-really-retire-138820\">Read the full article at BenefitsCanada.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jennifer Paterson&nbsp;|&nbsp;November 22, 2019 I think it\u2019s fair to say that retirement security is top of mind for the majority of Canadians. And politicians are listening: it was constructive to see all the major&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17621"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lifeinsurance-orleans.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}